SCREENING GLOSSARY · GUIDEUPDATED 2026-09-04
    Screening Glossary

    What is transliteration in sanctions screening?

    Transliteration is writing a name from one script into another, Cyrillic, Arabic or Chinese into the Latin alphabet. Several renderings of the same name are equally valid, so screening has to compare variants rather than a single spelling.

    Sanctions lists are compiled from documents in many scripts and each authority applies its own conventions. The same Russian surname turns up as Shchedrin, Schedrin or Sxedrin; the same Arabic given name as Mohammed, Muhammad or Mohamed. None of this is an error, and all of them are defensible renderings. The practical consequence is that a system comparing exact strings across scripts will miss designated parties, so the original script is worth preserving wherever you can obtain it.

    What this workflow covers

    SCOPE
    • Map the customer name and the list entry to a common representation, or expand both into variant sets, before measuring similarity.
    • An invoice supplies a Ukrainian counterparty in Latin script while the EU entry carries the Cyrillic original plus an official transliteration. Both have to be compared.
    • Chinese and Hungarian names put the family name first and Arabic names carry patronymic elements, so name order has to be handled or the components mismatch.
    • Full Search layers transliteration and alias matching on top of the deterministic Quick Check, which compares the name exactly as supplied.
    • Transliteration converts script, not meaning. Nicknames and assumed names are a separate problem, handled as aliases.

    Compliance glossary

    TERMS
    Script normalisation
    Mapping names from different writing systems into a common representation so they can be compared consistently.
    Original script
    The name as written in its native writing system, published by some authorities alongside the Latin rendering.

    Authoritative references

    SOURCES

    Frequently asked questions

    Q&A
    Q.01
    Why does one person have five spellings on the list?
    Because names originally written in Cyrillic, Arabic, Chinese or another script can be rendered into Latin characters in several equally valid ways, and because authorities compile entries from documents produced in different countries with different conventions.
    Q.02
    How much does this cost us in missed matches?
    Directly and invisibly. Without transliteration handling, a designated party stored in your system under a different rendering simply does not match, and the resulting false negative produces no alert for anyone to review.
    Q.03
    Should we store names in the original script?
    Where you can obtain it, yes. Keeping the original alongside the Latin rendering removes an entire class of matching ambiguity and makes any later review much easier to defend.