M&A & Partnerships
Would you sign a deal with someone you haven't screened?
A partner with hidden sanctions exposure can turn your strategic deal into an enforcement action.
Deal #2024-DEU-047 — Due Diligence Dashboard
Entity
Acquisition target
Transaction
Deal parameters
Due Diligence
Completion status
Risk Assessment
Current status
Assessment running
Compliance screen in progress
Compliance Check — Layer 1
Direct entity sanctions screen
OFAC SDN
EU Consolidated
UN Security Council
UK HM Treasury
Australia DFAT
Switzerland SECO
6 of 6 lists clear. No direct sanctions matches on entity name.
Note: Surface-level check only. Ownership layer analysis pending.
Ownership Analysis — Layer 2
Deep UBO tracing — 4 corporate layers
EuroTech Solutions GmbH
Germany
TechHold AG
Switzerland
Meridian Investments Ltd
Cyprus
Eastern Capital BVI
British Virgin Islands
V. Sorokin
FLAGGEDUBO — PEP + connected to sanctioned entity
PEP designation + indirect link to OFAC-designated entity
Ownership Graph — Interactive View
Key Finding
The beneficial owner, V. Sorokin, is identified as a Politically Exposed Person (PEP) and has an indirect connection to an entity designated under OFAC SDN. This finding does not appear in the surface-level entity check.
PEP connection identified in ownership chain — V. Sorokin, Layer 4, BVI entity. Indirect exposure to OFAC SDN designated counterparty.
Risk classification: Enhanced Due Diligence required before transaction proceeds.
Comparable Enforcement Actions
Research — M&A compliance failuresEricsson AB
DOJ / FCPA · 2022
$1.06B
penalty
Bribery through intermediaries with sanctioned-linked entities in Iraq. Compliance failures traceable to inadequate UBO screening of third-party agents.
Airbus SE
DOJ / SFO / PNF · 2020
€3.6B
penalty
Systematic use of business partners and intermediaries without adequate screening across multiple jurisdictions including Middle East and Asia.
Ericsson
$1.06B2022
Failed to conduct adequate due diligence on third-party agents used in M&A-adjacent supply chain acquisitions. FCPA violations traced to partners in Djibouti, China, and Vietnam.
Airbus
$4B2020
Paid bribes through business partners and third-party consultants across 20 countries. Due diligence on intermediaries was either absent or deliberately circumvented during deal execution.
Risk Assessment — RAG Matrix
HIGH RISKDirect Sanctions Exposure
Entity not on any active list
PEP Exposure
V. Sorokin — Layer 4 beneficial owner
Indirect Sanctions Linkage
UBO linked to SDN-designated entity
Corporate Structure Opacity
BVI/Cyprus holding structure
Adverse Media
UBO association findings
Overall Deal Risk
Enhanced Due Diligence required
Deal Recommendation
PROCEED WITH ENHANCED DUE DILIGENCETransaction must not proceed without resolving the following conditions
Risk analysis identified PEP exposure and indirect sanctions linkage at the UBO level. Financial and legal DD are complete. Compliance DD requires escalation.
Obtain full disclosure on V. Sorokin's current PEP status and designations
Conduct enhanced background on the BVI holding entity Eastern Capital
Verify the nature of the connection to the OFAC-designated counterparty
Consider restructuring deal to exclude or ring-fence problematic ownership layers
Obtain legal opinion on regulatory implications for acquiring jurisdiction
Process
From term sheet to risk clearance
Most screenings complete in under ten minutes.
Partnership proposal received
Enter the entity name, jurisdiction, and any known principals — the platform accepts names in any script.
Deep research screening
The AI checks sanctions lists, PEP databases, adverse media in 50+ languages, and corporate registries while tracing ownership chains automatically.
UBO graph review
Review the ownership map — every entity and individual screened, with hidden connections and indirect exposures highlighted.
Risk committee presentation
Export a board-ready evidence package with findings, source citations, ownership graphs, and a recommended risk tier.
Ongoing monitoring
Post-closing, continuous monitoring alerts your team when the partner's sanctions status, PEP connections, or ownership structure changes.
10+
Sanctions regimes screened per partner
ScreenVeritAI coverage
50+
Languages covered by AI adverse media research
ScreenVeritAI multi-language engine
<10min
Average time to full partner risk profile with UBO graph
ScreenVeritAI benchmarks
Reference
Partner due diligence FAQ
When should we run partner due diligence screening?
What information do we need to screen an M&A target or JV partner?
How does ScreenVeritAI trace ownership through complex corporate structures?
Does the screening cover subsidiaries and affiliated entities?
How is the evidence package formatted for deal rooms and boards?
What happens after the deal closes?
Can we screen multiple M&A targets or partners at once?
How does this relate to FCPA and UK Bribery Act compliance?
Key terms
Regulatory and industry sources
- [1]US Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) — DOJ and SEC Enforcement
US Department of Justice
- [2]UK Bribery Act 2010 — Guidance on Commercial Organisations
UK Government Legislation
- [3]OFAC Guidance on Mergers, Acquisitions, and Sanctions Compliance
US Department of the Treasury, OFAC
- [4]FATF Guidance on Beneficial Ownership and Transparency
Financial Action Task Force
- [5]EU Anti-Money Laundering Regulation (AMLR) 2024/1624
Official Journal of the European Union
Related workflows
Screen a New Customer
KYC onboarding checks for new client relationships.
Vendor & Supplier Due Diligence
Screen your supply chain for hidden ownership and risk exposure.
Batch Portfolio Rescreening
Rescreen your entire counterparty portfolio in a single batch run.
API Integration
Embed screening into your deal management workflow via REST API.