Chi c'è dall'altra parte del Suo ordine d'acquisto?
Un solo fornitore non verificato può trascinare l'intera Sua organizzazione in un'indagine sulle sanzioni.
Enforcement gazette
p. 01 / 08What inadequate supplier screening costs
Three penalties, and in each one the name on the contract was never the problem.
Selected supply-chain and third-party enforcement penalties
$1.06B
Ericsson · 2022
DOJ found Ericsson paid bribes through intermediaries in Iraq, Djibouti, China, Vietnam, and Indonesia to win telecom contracts.
What they missed: No one traced who controlled the intermediary companies receiving payments.
$1.1B
Glencore · 2022
Glencore bribed officials across seven countries using a network of third-party agents — none of whom were screened for debarment.
What they missed: Supplier screening stopped at the named company. The agents behind it were never checked.
$635M
British American Tobacco · 2023
BAT was sanctioned for facilitating exports through a North Korea-linked distribution network embedded in their supply chain.
What they missed: The distributor had a clean company name. The UBO had a sanctions designation.
"They all passed a basic name check."
Sanctions screen — every source, two hits
p. 02 / 08A single-list check would have cleared this vendor.
OFAC SDN and DGT France both flag Novex Industrial Supplies LLC. One list returns nothing; the 51 sanctions sources in a €0.39 Quick Check return two, one of them a French national designation a US-only screen never looks at.
2 matches — OFAC SDN (US) and DGT France (FR). Coverage is not a rounding error: it is the difference between two hits and none.
OFAC SDN
US · US Treasury
Entry SDN-40217 · NOVEX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES LLC · name + address · score 0.98
EU Consolidated List
EU · CFSP measures
0 candidates
UN Security Council
UN · Consolidated list
0 candidates
UK HM Treasury
GB · OFSI consolidated
0 candidates
Australia DFAT
AU · Consolidated list
0 candidates
Switzerland SECO
CH · Sanctions measures
0 candidates
Canada SEMA
CA · Global Affairs Canada
0 candidates
MAS Singapore
SG · Targeted financial sanctions
0 candidates
METI Japan
JP · End-user list
0 candidates
DGT France
FR · Registre national des gels
Entry FR-2023-0917 · alias NOVEX INDUSTRIAL · name match · score 0.94
"Two matches. Two jurisdictions. A basic vendor check would have missed the French list."
Ownership trace
p. 03 / 08Who really controls this vendor?
The company name matches nothing. Three corporate layers down, the ultimate beneficial owner is a different story, and the €14.90 Deep Research Report cites a source URL for every step of the chain.
Novex Industrial Supplies LLC
Subject entity
Mid-East Trading Co
Cyprus · 70% stake
Eastern Holdings BVI
British Virgin Islands · 100%
V. Petrov
Ultimate Beneficial Owner
3 corporate layers traced. UBO identified: V. Petrov — flagged on the World Bank debarment list.
"The vendor looked legitimate. Three layers down, the UBO sits on a debarment list."
Real enforcement cases
p. 04 / 08The supply chain cases that changed compliance
Ericsson
DOJ / FCPA · 2022
$1.06B
$1.06B
Ericsson pleaded guilty to FCPA violations for bribing officials in Djibouti, China, Vietnam, Indonesia, and Kuwait through third-party agents in the supply chain. The company had failed to conduct adequate due diligence on intermediaries used to win telecom contracts.
Glencore International
DOJ / CFTC · 2022
$1.1B
$1.1B
Glencore admitted to a decade-long bribery scheme involving commodity trading agents across Africa, South America, and Southeast Asia. Suppliers and trading partners received corrupt payments funneled through shell companies in high-risk jurisdictions.
British American Tobacco
OFAC / DOJ · 2023
$635M
$635M
BAT's subsidiary allowed a North Korean entity to participate in tobacco supply chains via a third-party partner in Singapore. The counterparty was ultimately controlled by an OFAC-designated entity. BAT's supplier screening failed to trace beneficial ownership.
Quick Check €0.39: sanctions, PEP and 16 criminal watchlists on any name · Deep Research Report €14.90: maps the ownership and officer network and names the parties to screen
The verdict
p. 05 / 08Decision: reject — with the evidence attached.
Two sanctions hits, a debarment-listed beneficial owner and one adverse-media finding, all of it on the record before the first purchase order. The snapshot is stored as it stood today and never recalculated when a list moves.
Point-in-time snapshot · sources cited · never recalculated
Dalla richiesta di approvvigionamento all'autorizzazione del rischio
p. 06 / 08Invia i dati del fornitore
Inserisca la ragione sociale del vendor, il Paese ed eventuali identificativi disponibili — nomi commerciali, numeri di registrazione o nomi degli amministratori.
L'agente IA esegue lo screening vendor
Liste di sanzioni, registri PEP, adverse media e registri camerali vengono verificati simultaneamente con traslitterazione automatica dei nomi.
Riveda i risultati della due diligence
I risultati includono punteggi di confidenza della corrispondenza, citazioni delle fonti e catene di ragionamento, così il Suo team sa esattamente cosa è stato segnalato e perché.
Approvi, escali o rifiuti
La piattaforma raccomanda un livello di rischio — il Suo team di conformità acquisti prende la decisione finale con evidenze complete a disposizione.
Pianifichi un ri-screening periodico
Imposti una cadenza di ri-screening per rilevare nuove designazioni di sanzioni, adverse media o variazioni di titolarità dopo l'approvazione iniziale.
By the numbers
p. 07 / 08Ogni
Fonte ufficiale verificata per fornitore
Copertura ScreenVeritAI
50+
Lingue cercate per gli adverse media sui vendor
Motore multilingue ScreenVeritAI
<5 min
Tempo medio per un profilo di rischio completo del fornitore
Benchmark ScreenVeritAI
FAQ sullo screening fornitori
p. 08 / 0801Quali informazioni servono per sottoporre a screening un nuovo fornitore?
02Quanto tempo richiede uno screening fornitore completo?
03Posso sottoporre a screening fornitori con sede in Paesi non anglofoni?
04Lo screening verifica le liste di debarment ed esclusione?
05In cosa differisce da un questionario di autovalutazione fornitore?
06Posso sottoporre a screening l'intero elenco fornitori esistente in una volta sola?
07Il report di screening è sufficiente per gli audit normativi e di approvvigionamento?
08Posso integrare lo screening fornitori nel nostro sistema di approvvigionamento?
- 01FATF Guidance on Correspondent Banking Services
Financial Action Task Force
- 02US Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Subpart 9.4 — Debarment, Suspension, and Ineligibility
US General Services Administration
- 03EU Directive 2014/24/EU on Public Procurement — Exclusion Grounds (Article 57)
Official Journal of the European Union
- 04UK Bribery Act 2010 — Failure to Prevent Bribery (Section 7)
UK Government Legislation
- 05OFAC Guidance on Compliance Commitments — Supply Chain Sanctions Risk
US Department of the Treasury
Sottoponi a screening un nuovo cliente
Screening KYC di onboarding per nuovi clienti e controparti.
Due diligence dei partner
Screening approfondito per M&A, JV e partnership commerciali.
Ri-screening del portafoglio in batch
Ri-verifichi l'intero elenco fornitori o base clienti in poche ore.
Integrazione API
Integri lo screening nel Suo sistema di approvvigionamento via API.
End of supplier file.