Core sanctions regimes covered
10+
ScreenVeritAI coverage model
Use Case Workflows
M and A and JV Partner Screening
Assess acquisition, merger, and joint-venture counterparties with deeper risk context.
Use this workflow for strategic transactions and corporate partnerships. It helps teams detect sanctions and ownership exposure before closing or entering long-term arrangements.
Updated: 2026-02-20
What this workflow covers
- Run comprehensive checks on target entities and key principals.
- Map ownership complexity and related-party links.
- Support deal committees with evidence-backed risk summaries.
Key statistics
Key workflow dimensions
4 (Sanctions, PEP, Adverse Media, UBO)
ScreenVeritAI workflow model
Compliance glossary
Sanctions screening
A control process that checks a person or entity against sanctions and watchlist datasets.
PEP
Politically Exposed Person: an individual in a prominent public function requiring enhanced due diligence.
UBO
Ultimate Beneficial Owner: the natural person who ultimately owns or controls a legal entity.
Authoritative references
- OFAC Sanctions Lists
U.S. Department of the Treasury
- EU Financial Sanctions Database
European Commission
- UN Security Council Consolidated List
United Nations Security Council
Expert perspective
\"Risk controls perform best when sanctions checks and ownership context are reviewed together.\"
ScreenVeritAI Compliance Team, RegTech Research
Frequently asked questions
Why include sanctions checks in deal due diligence?
Strategic transactions can transfer hidden compliance exposure if not screened early.
Can this support joint venture partner reviews?
Yes. The workflow is suitable for M and A, joint ventures, and strategic partnerships.
What does ownership analysis add in this context?
It helps reveal indirect control and related-party risk that may be absent from surface checks.
Can this be reused during post-deal integration?
Yes. The same workflow can support integration monitoring and periodic reassessment.