Sanctions News Desk · OFAC · Delistings

    OFAC removed 125 people and companies on 5 October. Its own page prints 181 rows, and 18 more aliases went with the updates

    On 5 October 2026 OFAC removed 125 individuals and entities from the SDN List and updated 22 entries, the third round of what Treasury calls sanctions modernization. OFAC's own page prints 181 deletion rows for those 125, because every alias is a row of its own, and a further 18 alias rows went out with the updates, named only in the cumulative change file. Two of the removed people are still on the UK list, and two tankers changed name without keeping the old one.

    By ScreenVeritAI Team, Sanctions News Desk

    Key facts

    • Individuals and entities removed: 125
    • Deletion rows printed on OFAC's page: 181
    • Entries updated: 22: 16 Mexican individuals, 3 Hong Kong companies, 3 tankers
    • Alias rows dropped inside the updates: 18
    • Removed names still on the UK list: 2: Tibisay Lucena Ramirez and Aliaksei Auramenka
    • Tankers renamed: LA PEARL to JAMES II (IMO 9174660), VICTORIA to DA LI (IMO 9113379)

    What changed

    OFAC deleted 125 entries from the SDN List on 5 October and rewrote 22 others. Treasury's release calls it the third round of the modernization effort Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent announced in May. The release gives two numbers. OFAC's page gives more.

    Removed, per Treasury125 individuals and entities
    Deletion rows on OFAC's page181
    Updated, per Treasury22 entries
    Alias rows dropped inside updates18, named only in the cumulative change file
    Reasons givenDeceased individuals, defunct companies, entries lacking enough information to screen

    Treasury says the removals followed interagency review, and that the updates "added new identifiers and removed outdated ones". The release points to the recent-actions page as its complete list and does not say which reason applies to which entry. It also counts the 18 September removal of six entries under the Ethiopia programme as part of the same effort.

    The page prints 181 rows because aliases are rows

    We counted the page ourselves, from the HTML. There are 181 deletion rows: 114 tagged [SDNT], 59 [IRAQ2], 4 [VENEZUELA] and 4 [BELARUS-EO14038]. Treasury says 125.

    The gap is aliases. OFAC's page prints a subject once under each of its names, so one person or company can take several rows. Tariq Abu Shanab Est. for Trade & Commerce, an Iraq-programme establishment at Musherfeh, Zarka, Jordan, takes eight rows by itself. Hikmet Abdallah al-Bazzaz takes two, one per spelling of his name.

    When we joined every alias row to the entry it repeats, 181 rows became exactly 125 subjects: 78 individuals and 47 entities. So Treasury's figure is the right one to quote, and 181 is the right one to expect in a data file. A total below 125 cannot be reproduced from the page.

    The count does not stop there. The page lists 22 updates, matching Treasury. But in the cumulative change file, three of the update groups carry a paragraph beginning "resulting in the removal of the following". Those name 18 further alias rows that were deleted without appearing on the page as deletions: 13 under [SDNTK], 4 for the tanker NAVARZ and 1 for LA PEARL. They are not part of the 125, because the entries they belonged to stay listed. A row-by-row diff of your own file against the new SDN List should therefore find 199 rows gone: 181 plus 18.

    Who left, and why the stated reason fits only some

    Treasury's third reason, entries too thin to screen against, is an argument about false positives. We checked what the printed rows carry.

    TagRowsSubjectsIndividuals / entitiesWhat the rows carry
    [IRAQ2]594134 / 7No document or registration number on any of the 41; 4 individuals have a birth year
    [SDNT]1148040 / 40All 40 individuals have a birth date and a document number, 37 of them Colombian cedulas; 38 of 40 entities have a registration number
    [VENEZUELA]433 / 0Birth date and cedula
    [BELARUS-EO14038]411 / 0Birth date, passport, national ID

    The thin entries are the Iraq-programme ones. Of 34 individuals, 30 have neither a birth date nor a document number, and some are located only as "Iraq". Wallid Issa Ahmad is a name, the word Iraq, and nothing else. Entries like that are what false positives are made of, and a screening file is better without them.

    The 40 narcotics-programme individuals are different. Every one has a birth date and a document number. A match on Luis Antonio Hernandez Zea, born 7 May 1960, with a cedula and two passport numbers on the row, was never ambiguous. For these the stated reasons left are death and dissolution, and the release does not say which is which. A well-identified name coming off the list says nothing about the person's risk today. The two entities with no registration number are Largo Leasing Ltd. in the Cayman Islands and Trans Pacific World Leasing Limited in Vanuatu.

    Two of the 125 are still on the UK list

    Removal from the SDN List ends the OFAC listing. It does not touch another authority's list, and we checked.

    We compared the primary name of every removed subject with the UK Sanctions List (report date 8 October 2026), the UN consolidated list (generated 8 October) and the EU consolidated export (generated 22 September). The test required every token of a name to appear in one entry.

    Two subjects matched, and both matches agree on birth date.

    • Tibisay Lucena Ramirez, born 26 April 1959, whose UK statement of reasons describes her as former President of Venezuela's National Electoral Council. UK Unique ID VEN0017, designated 31 December 2020.
    • Aliaksei Auramenka, born 11 May 1977, listed by the UK as Minister for Transport and Communication of Belarus. UK Unique ID BEL0100, designated 21 June 2021. The EU export also holds him, under reference EU.6455.84, with the same birth date.

    Both carry full identifiers on their OFAC rows. The release does not explain their removal, and we do not guess.

    Nothing among the 41 Iraq-programme names matched in the UN or EU files. That is a limit of the test, not a clearance: an exact-token test misses transliterations and reordered names, and Iraq-programme names are mostly transliterations.

    Two tankers were renamed, and the old names were not kept

    Three of the 22 updates are vessels. For the two renamed ones, the new entry records the former flag but not the former name.

    Old nameNew nameIMOFlagOther change
    LA PEARLJAMES II9174660Tanzania to CuracaoBuild year 1998 added; MMSI unchanged
    VICTORIADA LI9113379Sao Tome and Principe to NicaraguaBuild year 1996 added; MMSI 668116259 to 350179000
    NAVARZNAVARZ9079078Iran, unchangedCall sign T2DQ4 to EPDN6; MMSI 572441210 to 422075200; build year 1996 added; former flags Malta, Tuvalu and Tanzania dropped

    A cargo file holding LA PEARL or VICTORIA will no longer match anything on the SDN List by name. The IMO number carries over, and it is the identifier to key on. For NAVARZ the name stays, but four alias rows were removed: ELITE, NAPOLI, NOAH and VOYAGER.

    One of those names deserves a note. ELITE was an alias of two different ships, NAVARZ and LA PEARL, with different IMO numbers. A stored alert on "ELITE" pointed at either hull and cannot be resolved by name. Both ELITE rows are gone.

    Sixteen people gained a C.U.R.P. and three companies lost addresses

    The other 19 updates are the clean-up Treasury describes. All 16 Mexican individuals now carry a C.U.R.P., the national personal ID number, and several lost street addresses and alternative birth dates. Javier Torres Felix lost four aliases, among them COMPADRE and EL JT, and his Culiacan address. Hector Luis Palma Salazar lost two of his three birth dates and became Jesus Hector Palma Salazar, the old primary name demoted to an alias.

    The three Hong Kong companies, AE International Trade Co Limited, Hin Yun Trading Company Limited and Qian Xi Long Trading Co Limited, lost their street addresses and are now located only as "Hong Kong, China". Hin Yun and Qian Xi Long shared one address on Lockhart Road in Wanchai. A rule that flagged "same address as a listed party" no longer links them.

    What to do this week

    1. Diff by row, report by subject. Expect 199 rows gone from a data file and 125 subjects to explain, plus the entries that were rewritten.
    2. Re-open stored decisions on the removed names, keep the original block record, and log the removal with its date.
    3. Check the UK, EU and UN lists before releasing a counterparty. Two of the 125 are still listed in the UK.
    4. Re-key the three ships on IMO number, 9174660, 9113379 and 9079078.
    5. Refresh stored aliases for the 16 Mexican individuals and the three Hong Kong companies, so recall does not drift.

    The Federal Register notice of 7 October (91 FR 64224) is a different action: it publishes the removals of 27 July. We did not find the 5 October entries in it.

    How ScreenVeritAI handles this

    A delisting only helps you if the old decision can be found and re-opened. ScreenVeritAI saves each screening as a point-in-time record, and scheduled re-screens run a stored counterparty list again on a daily, weekly or monthly schedule. See batch screening.

    What this post does not say

    This is a report of what OFAC and Treasury published on 5 October 2026, plus our own count of OFAC's page and our comparison with three public list files. We have not checked how any screening vendor, including ours, handled the 5 October entries, and we make no statement about our own data.

    We do not know why any individual entry was removed. The release gives three reasons by category, introduced with "include". The UK, EU and UN comparison is an exact-token test on primary names; it can miss a subject. The EU file was generated on 22 September, so a later EU change is not reflected. A removal ends one listing and gives no opinion on whether the party is risky today.

    Frequently asked questions

    How many entries did OFAC remove from the SDN List on 5 October 2026?

    Treasury says 125 individuals and entities. OFAC's recent-actions page prints 181 deletion rows, because aliases are separate rows: 59 tagged [IRAQ2], 114 [SDNT], 4 [VENEZUELA] and 4 [BELARUS-EO14038]. Joining each alias row to the entry it repeats gives 125 subjects, 78 individuals and 47 entities. A further 18 alias rows were dropped from entries that remain listed, and those are named only in OFAC's cumulative change file.

    Treasury says 125 and the page shows 181. Which number goes in the file note?

    Both, labelled. The page can be counted three ways: 181 rows, 125 subjects, or 199 rows once the 18 alias rows removed inside the updates are added. Treasury's 125 is the count of subjects and it is correct; no total below 125 can be reproduced from the page. Quote subjects when you report the action and rows when you reconcile a data file, and say which one you are using.

    We closed a true match on one of the removed names last year. What do we do with it?

    Re-open it, record the removal with its date and the OFAC action, and close it with the reason. Do not delete the original decision: the file has to explain why the party was blocked and why it no longer is. Then check the name against the UK, EU and UN lists before releasing anything, because two of the 125 are still on the UK list.

    OFAC dropped a name. Can we stop screening it against the UK and EU lists?

    No. Lucena Ramirez (UK ID VEN0017, designated 31 December 2020) and Auramenka (UK ID BEL0100, designated 21 June 2021) were deleted by OFAC on 5 October and remain on the UK list. Auramenka also appears in the EU list export we checked, under reference EU.6455.84. Each list is a separate legal instrument kept by a separate authority, and OFAC's deletion changes none of the others.

    How do I find the renamed ships in a vessel or vendor file?

    Search by IMO number: 9174660 for LA PEARL, now JAMES II; 9113379 for VICTORIA, now DA LI; 9079078 for NAVARZ, whose call sign and MMSI changed. OFAC's new entries record the former flag but not the former name, so a file that holds only LA PEARL or VICTORIA will no longer match anything on the SDN List.

    Why would an alias like COMPADRE disappear while the person stays listed?

    OFAC rewrote the entry for Javier Torres Felix. The new row drops four alternative names, including COMPADRE and EL JT, and his Culiacan street address; it narrows his birth place from Mexico to Sinaloa and adds a gender and a Mexican personal ID number (C.U.R.P.). He is still listed under [SDNTK]. A search on the old nickname now returns nothing, which is a loss of recall if your counterparty file used it.

    Sources

    1. Designations Removals; Designations Updates; Publication of Iran-related OFAC Alert; Publication of Amended Iran-related Frequently Asked Question — Office of Foreign Assets Control, October 9, 2026
    2. Treasury Announces Third Round of Sanctions Removals, Updates in Modernization Initiative — U.S. Department of the Treasury, October 9, 2026
    3. Changes to the Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List since January 1, 2026 — Office of Foreign Assets Control, October 9, 2026
    4. Notice of OFAC Sanctions Actions, 91 FR 64224 (7 October 2026) — Federal Register, October 9, 2026
    5. The UK Sanctions List (report date 8 October 2026) — UK Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office, October 9, 2026
    6. EU Financial Sanctions Database, consolidated list export (generated 22 September 2026) — European Commission, October 9, 2026
    7. United Nations Security Council Consolidated List (generated 8 October 2026) — United Nations Security Council, October 9, 2026

    Run screening|All analyses

    Informational analysis of published regulatory sources. Not legal advice. Verify the primary sources before acting.