Core sanctions regimes covered
10+
ScreenVeritAI coverage model
Use Case Workflows
Ongoing Sanctions Monitoring
Move from one-time checks to continuous risk monitoring across active counterparties.
Use this workflow for periodic re-screening and ongoing surveillance. It helps detect risk changes after onboarding and reduce exposure from stale checks.
Updated: 2026-02-20
What this workflow covers
- Run scheduled re-screening across active counterparties.
- Capture new sanctions, PEP, or media-risk developments.
- Maintain up-to-date evidence for compliance controls.
Key statistics
Key workflow dimensions
4 (Sanctions, PEP, Adverse Media, UBO)
ScreenVeritAI workflow model
Compliance glossary
Sanctions screening
A control process that checks a person or entity against sanctions and watchlist datasets.
PEP
Politically Exposed Person: an individual in a prominent public function requiring enhanced due diligence.
UBO
Ultimate Beneficial Owner: the natural person who ultimately owns or controls a legal entity.
Authoritative references
- OFAC Sanctions Lists
U.S. Department of the Treasury
- EU Financial Sanctions Database
European Commission
- UN Security Council Consolidated List
United Nations Security Council
Expert perspective
\"Risk controls perform best when sanctions checks and ownership context are reviewed together.\"
ScreenVeritAI Compliance Team, RegTech Research
Frequently asked questions
Why is ongoing monitoring needed after onboarding?
Counterparty risk can change over time; periodic checks help detect new exposure quickly.
How often should re-screening happen?
Frequency depends on risk tier, jurisdiction, and policy requirements.
Can monitoring outputs be audited?
Yes. Monitoring events can be retained with source context and timestamps.
Does monitoring include adverse media changes?
Yes. Ongoing monitoring can include adverse media and related-party risk signals.